Skip to main content

Organising a conference, Mix-IT 2012






On the 26th of April 2012, Mix-IT 2012 took place in Lyon. This second edition was handled by the same team as the first. As the internal organisation had matured, the team was more relaxed and the pressure only soared in the last days before the conference.

The following paragraphs concern my own feelings and what I learned. This is not the Mix-IT team view, which is available on the Mix-IT web site.

Organising an IT conference is a pleasant exercise, mainly due to the rewards of meeting passionate people and skilled speakers. Hereafter, find a list of points to address when you want to launch a conference and my current opinion related to Mix-IT.  

Defined goals: If you just launched an event without goals in mind, being consistent in the organisation would be hard. Choices would be difficult to make and would lead to long hours of unproductive discussion.

For me, the Mix-IT goals are:
The entry price must be affordable to every IT guy. Even an unemployed person should be able to afford it from her own money. This year the price was €30.
All talks and games must be of a high quality. It doesn’t mean the speakers need to be famous, but they do need to be good.

Differentiation: More and more events for passionate people will be launched. Your brand must be understood. Is it fun, traditional, for local people, big and international, for experts?

For me, what makes Mix-IT different is:

A diverse content mixed with a desire to create information technology that works NOW.
The conference experience of a participant should open her/his mind to new knowledge and also help her/him to improve others.
Both genders make it happen.
Participants’ conversations and meetings should improve the effectiveness of communities.

Commitment of Organisation team: If your conference is organised only by volunteers, you need to define roles. Make sure the quality of your event won’t suffer from a dysfunctional team. Trust is mandatory. Having the guts to say what the organisation principles are, is probably the best way to avoid conflict.

For me, the Mix-IT is organised:
By self organisation, where the main principle is commitment to users.
By each organiser making sure the task she/he agreed to perform is done. Done means: Conference users will at least not complain about it after the event. e. g. an organiser in charge of a task makes sure it is completed before the conference and is still concerned about it during the conference.

Focus on quality: You should define what quality is from your point of view, and stick to it.

For me, a quality Mix-IT is:
a focus on participant well-being, e. g.
Participants should find water and coffee all day long. Toilets must be clean. Everything must flow. Visual signs and boards are mandatory: e. g. Programs are displayed everywhere.

Speakers are the essence: Speakers are the key to the whole. Whether you invited them or they proposed a session during the “Call for paper”, you must pay huge attention to them all, before, during and after the conference.

For me, at Mix-IT we did the following:
We made sure their hotels and the travel were booked one week before the conference.
We asked for the material they needed for the conference,
We picked up foreign speakers at the airport,
We invited them for a dinner the night before the conference (The food was average, but it was nice to share with them),
We invited them to the closing social event after the conference.

Do not forget the sponsors: Sponsors also deserve particular attention. Make sure they can communicate with the participants as they expected.

Self improvement: Make sure you get something out of the conference.
Before writing the previous content, I went back to last year’s post and I realised, the team met in december 2010.

My own pleasures were:

Team work without conflict,
Exchanging and listening to the speakers during dinners with them,
Learning during the talks and games
Meeting a lot of passionate people

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learning about Data Science?

This is the end of a beautiful summer, and also one of the warmer recorded in France. I’m continuing my journey in the product management world and today I’m living in the product marketing one too. I will blog about this later. During this first half of this year, I read several articles on big data and started to understand how important the data science discipline is. Being able to define a direction/goal to search, collecting the proper data, then using a collection of techniques to extract something others can’t see - it sounds like magic. Also, when I listened to the Udacity Linear Disgression podcast episode “Hunting the Higgs”, I understood people with these skills can be better at solving a problem than the domain experts themselves. Katie Malone explained that in a competition to solve a particle physics problem, the best results came from machine learning people. Then I read the article about Zenefit on the vision mobile website : “Zenefits is an insurance compan

Lancement de ProductTank Lyon

Tout d’abord, bonne année 2020. Je me suis investi ces dernières années dans les communautés/événements CARA Lyon, MiXiTConf, LyonDataScience et CaféDevOps sur Lyon, France. Ces activités m’ont permis de comprendre les experts de ces domaines, d’apprendre quelques notions fondamentales à travers leurs exposés et d'améliorer mes capacités d’échange avec eux. Product Manager depuis plus de 5 ans, je désire améliorer mes réflexes et compétences dans mon domaine. Le faire à travers des rencontres/meetup est ce que je préfère et j’aimerais retrouver la stimulation des communautés dans cette discipline. En cette année 2020, quelques Product Manager Lyonnais, lançons, le meetup ProductTankLyon à Lyon, France. Le réseau ProductTank compte plus de 150 meetup dans le monde et profite des conférences, blog et podcast MindTheProduct. Inscrivez-vous ici , si vous voulez vous joindre à nous.

Read bead experiment

The "Read bead experiment" was created by Dr. Edward Deming and aim to demonstrate the ineffectiveness (sometimes effectiveness) of the various management methods. At the end of the experiment, a statistical graphical tool is used to analyse the experiment's results. By following this exercise, you will understand that actions taken by the people playing the managers are detrimental to the employees, but after the analyses are shown to have no impact on the efficiency of the process . The conclusion proposes ways to properly use performance data in a quality environment in order to achieve continual improvement. The several videos by Fluor Hanford (Steve Prevette) posted below, will help you to understand what is really important in a process. Meet the  company  with its "willing workers", quality control personnel, a data recorder, and a foreman. All wish to produce white beads using a 50 holed paddle, but unfortunately there are bad quality red beads.