Skip to main content

Music: From Monoculture to Silots

 

I recently watched a video titled "What’s a Monoculture? How Artists Are Bigger and Smaller Than Ever" on YouTube, which got me thinking about the shift from music monoculture to silos. This change has significantly impacted how we consume and experience music today.

Monoculture and Silos:
- Monoculture: This refers to a shared cultural experience where a few artists or pieces of content dominate the global scene. This was more prevalent during the MTV era when music videos and a few popular artists shaped the music landscape.
- Silos: In contrast, silos represent the fragmented nature of modern media consumption. Different groups of people are exposed to different content based on their preferences, leading to a more personalized but less universally shared experience.

from DALL·E 3
 

How Did This Happen?

Here is a timeline of the last 70 years of modern music to illustrate this shift:

Pre-MTV Era (1950s-1980s):
- Music was primarily consumed through radio, records, and live performances.
- Music videos were rare and mainly used as promotional tools.

MTV Era (1981-2000):
- 1981: Launch of MTV, revolutionizing the music industry by providing a visual platform for artists and fostering a shared cultural experience (monoculture).
- MTV turned music videos into an art form and a marketing tool, significantly influencing pop culture and the music industry.

File Sharing Era (1999-2001):
- 1999: Launch of Napster, a peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing application that allowed users to share music files directly, leading to widespread piracy and legal challenges.
- 2001: Napster ceased operations after losing multiple lawsuits.

Online Retailers (2003-2010):
- 2003: Launch of iTunes, creating the first legitimate digital music store that effectively challenged piracy and allowed consumers to purchase individual songs.
- iTunes became the world's largest music retailer and significantly impacted how music was bought and sold.

Internet and Social Media (2000s-Present):
- The rise of the internet and social media platforms further fragmented the music audience, allowing for a more diverse range of artists to reach niche audiences.
- Social media democratized music discovery and promotion, enabling artists to connect directly with fans.

Ad-Supported Streaming Services (2008-Present):
- 2008: Launch of Spotify, introducing a freemium model with both ad-supported and premium subscription options.
- Spotify transformed music consumption by offering instant access to a vast library of songs and using advanced algorithms for personalized playlists.

Algorithms and Personalization (2010s-Present):
- The use of algorithms by streaming services and social media platforms personalized music consumption, making it easier for listeners to discover new music tailored to their tastes.
- Algorithms contributed to the fragmentation of the audience and the decline of monoculture.

There is no better situation before or now, but for those who don't take the time to find silos that suit them, they could be lost today.

[Text reviewed by AI]

Sources:
The Evolution of Pop Music Industry: From the 1950s to 1970s
State of the Music Industry 2024: Trends and Challenges | iMusician
Do You *Actually* Miss The Monoculture? : r/LetsTalkMusic - Reddit
Can monoculture survive the algorithm? - Vox
Monoculture Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Evolution of Music from the 1950's to the 2000's
9 music trends to see in 2024 | Native Instruments Blog
Silo Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
What's a Monoculture? How Artists Are Bigger and Smaller Than Ever



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia statistics

Statistics have been published about Wikipedia and Wikimedia ( PDF Here) . The first lines are: According to comScore, Wikipedia is the fourth most popular web property, world-wide. In June, it served 327 million unique visitors. Wikipedia is available in 266 languages. It is continually expanded by approximately 100,000 active volunteer editors world-wide. The English version alone contains more than 2.9 million articles. All language editions combined contain more than 13.1 million articles. Next to English, the largest Wikipedia editions are German (911,000 articles), French (798,000 articles), Polish (600,000 articles), and Japanese (587,000 articles). For more see the original document . Sources : Resource Shelf : Updated: Key Statistics About Wikipedia and Wikimedia Foundation (September, 2009) « ResourceShelf

Lancement de ProductTank Lyon

Mise à jour 05/05/2023 : Le COVID aura tué ma motivation d’essayer de relancer ce meetup. Peut-être que d’autres le feront.  ---- Tout d’abord, bonne année 2020. Je me suis investi ces dernières années dans les communautés/événements CARA Lyon, MiXiTConf, LyonDataScience et CaféDevOps sur Lyon, France. Ces activités m’ont permis de comprendre les experts de ces domaines, d’apprendre quelques notions fondamentales à travers leurs exposés et d’améliorer mes capacités d’échange avec eux. Product Manager depuis plus de 5 ans, je désire améliorer mes réflexes et compétences dans mon domaine. Le faire à travers des rencontres/meetup est ce que je préfère et j’aimerais retrouver la stimulation des communautés dans cette discipline. En cette année 2020, quelques Product Manager lyonnais, lançons, le meetup ProductTankLyon à Lyon, France. Le réseau ProductTank compte plus de 150 meetups dans le monde et profite des conférences, blog et podcast MindTheProduct. Ins...

Learning about Data Science?

This is the end of a beautiful summer, and also one of the warmer recorded in France. I’m continuing my journey in the product management world and today I’m living in the product marketing one too. I will blog about this later. During this first half of this year, I read several articles on big data and started to understand how important the data science discipline is. Being able to define a direction/goal to search, collecting the proper data, then using a collection of techniques to extract something others can’t see - it sounds like magic. Also, when I listened to the Udacity Linear Disgression podcast episode “Hunting the Higgs”, I understood people with these skills can be better at solving a problem than the domain experts themselves. Katie Malone explained that in a competition to solve a particle physics problem, the best results came from machine learning people. Then I read the article about Zenefit on the vision mobile website : “Zenefits is an insurance compan...